What this all has in common is that you don't have to be doing anything wrong to be considered a criminal by the government at some point. Take a stance on an issue somewhere, and chances are you will find yourself under fire at one point in history or another, and very likely somewhere in the Modern World these abuses continue to be perpetrated on repeated occasions. Persecution of various people, including Christians, in Public Schools all over.Abuses of Law Enforcement in Modern America.Treatment of just about everyone at one point or another in the French revolutions.Treatment of Christians in the Russian Communist Regime.Treatment of the Jews in WWII by Germany.Treatment of the Chinese in WWII by Japan.Treatment of the Japanese in WWII in America.History is nearly defined by the various points in time where the governments have spent time criminalizing things that should not have been. There may not be a law or statute criminalizing what you do right now, but that won't stop the government. The problem here rests firmly in the idea that the government abuses its power if not now, then it will undoubtedly do it in the future, and very likely within your lifetime or the lifetime of one of your immediate relatives. Much of this reveals an implicit trust of the Government, and furthermore, not only a trust of the current administration, but a trust in the continuing benevolence of an entity that has demonstrated how un-benevolent it really is, over, and over, and over again. I am completely flabbergasted by the number of people who think this way. We can use the legal system to stop the government from doing this.It keeps us safer and protects us from terrorism, so it's worth it.Here are some of the common phrases that I hear: I am continually amazed at how many people readily acknowledge the dangers of the government having free access to all personal information on the Internet, and then turn right around and think that it is not relevant to them, or that it doesn't matter. I want to identify four major, dangerous attack vectors that exist in the Internet: Finally, I want to take a look at the RetroShare application, and see whether it delivers on its attempt to make real security and safety in the Internet Age an accessible reality. After that, I want to discuss what the traditional protections for being really secure look like, and why they are inadequate to the modern climate of the Internet. I also want to point out the current levels of security that most people have on their systems. I want to take time here to detail the dangers of the Internet as we now know it, emphasizing just how dangerous this really is. Traditional Internet protocols fail in one or more ways to provide a sufficient solution to this problem. In short, if you are using any of the commonly appreciated applications for communicating across the Internet, you are creating a dangerous footprint that can easily be used to abuse you and yours. The government relies on its weight to violate the privacy and safety of its citizens with impunity. Cloud platforms like Facebook and Google have made their money by convincing you that you don't care enough about your own privacy to worry what they do with the information that they give you. When it is your friends who do not protect information, any information you share with them must be considered public knowledge. When people do not understand how to protect themselves online, it leads to a lot of information leaks. And the world is not dangerous because of crackers and invasive criminals no, the Internet has grown more dangerous because there are so many other attack vectors that come at us. Many users do not understand how to properly secure their own machines. The Internet today is a dangerous place, not the least because of the pervasively insecure practices of so many of its users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |